Skip to main content

Future of Small Farms: A Bridge Between Society and the Environment

Small farmers can feed the world, help protect the environment and also provide livelihoods to millions of families who manage them. In addition, they produce valuable farm commodities for market and add value local and global economy. Future of agriculture is in protecting, supporting and improving small farms and the families who manage them. 



There are about 500 million small farms that provide direct and indirect employment to about 2 billion people. Small farms also generate valuable social capital by creating numerous opportunities for local community. They provide fresh produce to local shops, butchers, abattoirs, and support many cafes and restaurants that offer local cuisine, which is not possible without local and fresh produce. Local community depends on the viability of small farm and farming community, which are also source of employment for local population. 

They act as a fabric spread over the landscape and enhance both social and natural capital of the region. Worldwide research indicates that small farms, in contrast to large scale industrial farms, have higher biodiversity, better soil health, are less polluting to the water resources, emit less greenhouse gases, provide more farm jobs, are multi-functional in nature meaning they enhance environment and human health as they use less farm chemicals and fossil-fuel energy. 

Some national and regional policies such as the Common Agriculture Policy (CAP) of the European Union (EU) does not differentiate between good or bad practices on the farm. They favour large farms as the payments are linked to the acreage and not for the environmental and social outcomes. Small farms are not adequately rewarded for the social and environmental outcomes they generate through such policies. Moreover, the CAP has not resulted in any positive outcomes for biodiversity or human health as reported in many longitudinal studies. 

For the continuity of small farms, it is critical that future agricultural and food policies should support them for providing and enhancing social and natural capital so that they continue to grow nutritious and diverse food. At the same time, these measures to support good on-farm practices can help correct inadequacies of large farms by providing them incentives to change their practices for long-tern economic and environmental sustainability. There is need to further support and strengthen the ‘social anchor’ in communities, which is farming, through a simplified system to measure, assess and communicate sustainability. Such a system can bring transparency in facilitating public payments for public outcomes. The focus of global agriculture should be on small farms so that their role as a ‘bridge’ is strengthened to bring positive outcomes for society and the environment. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Campaign for the Support of Farmers in India

INDIAN GOVERNMENT NEEDS TO LISTEN TO FARMERS IN REFORMING AGRICULTURE IN INDIA   1. Three new  farm acts  in India are proving to be the last straw for about 90 million small-holders and their families. This has grave implications for about 800 million rural dwellers who are directly or indirectly dependent on farming for their livelihood. In addition, food security of the entire nation with 1.35 billion population is at risk. 2. Indian government maintains that these farm laws will usher a new economic revolution in the ailing farm sector. 3. Whereas farmers are opposing as they fear losing their land – only source of their livelihood – to corporate backed agri-enterprises. 4. The protest and persistence by farmers have opened up an opportunity for a dialogue between farmers and the government and for a new beginning. This has potential to reform small-holder agriculture but in close consultation with the farmers. 5. However, the rights of these farmers and many associated organisatio

Local Food Systems for Sustainability

Local, traditional, and indigenous food systems were successful in supplying year-round requirements for food and within the environmental constraints.  How were they able to do it? What were the practices and principles of local food systems that helped them thrive and maintain growing population in many parts of the world?  These food systems have been embedded in the society. Many traditional societies evolved around such unique food systems. Such food systems have been maintaining agricultural biodiversity and are important source of knowledge and culture as documented by the  Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems  (GIAHS) of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation. For example,  rice-fish-duck system in China,   traditional agriculture of Koraput, India ,  Noto’s Satoyama and Satoumi in Japan ,  Andean agriculture, Peru ,  Maasai Pastoralist Heritage Area in Tanzania , etc. These have been well documented around the world as source of inspir

ESG awakening is not enough: Adopt TCA to measure impacts

ESG - Environmental, Social and Governance – reporting by corporates has become widespread to demonstrate their social and responsible agenda. However, to manage any change in social, natural and economic environment due to business activities, there is need to measure their impacts. ESG rankings and scores fall short on measuring impacts and outcomes and are ineffective in catalyzing a strategic response to reduce these impacts. TCA – True Cost Accounting – tool can measure these impacts across four capitals (human, social, natural, and produced) in monetary terms. These impacts can then be included in balance sheets of corporates to improve decisions to effectively manage those changes and gain sustained competitive advantage. Read my article at London School of Economics Business Review